California Supreme Court· 12/28/2000
People v. Tindall
Citations
- 14 P.3d 207
- 102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 533
- 24 Cal. 4th 767
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 13666
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10224
- 2000 Cal. LEXIS 9409
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that criminal “defendants are most familiar with their own criminal records”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 705×
- People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 330×
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-08-22· cited 113×
- Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-08-27· cited 102×
- People v. YartzCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-12-05· cited 94×
- People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court· 2015-05-28· cited 72×
- People v. ROBERTO V.California Court of Appeal· 2001-11-28· cited 49×
- In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-06-15· cited 49×
- Douglass v. Serenivision, Inc.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-02-08· cited 45×
- People v. FielderCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-01-14· cited 43×
- Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateNinth Circuit· 2016-06-30· cited 29×
- People v. LetticeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-11-04· cited 17×
- People v. SawyersCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-09-26· cited 16×
- Thompson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-07-31· cited 15×
- ARLENA M. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-04-23· cited 14×
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-09-25· cited 14×
- Dibble v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-11-04· cited 6×
- Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters v. City of Monterey ParkCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-01-07· cited 5×
- Baron v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-09-04· cited 4×
- Cal. Sch. Boards Ass'n v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-01-16· cited 3×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-02-07· cited 849×
- Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 610×
- In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-03-07· cited 335×
- People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 335×
- Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-02-03· cited 230×
- California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-08-17· cited 221×
- Cowan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-12-09· cited 158×
- People v. ValladoliCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 149×
- People v. WimsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-06-05· cited 146×
- People v. MongeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-08-27· cited 145×
- People v. VeraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-05-01· cited 140×
- People v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court· 1987-07-06· cited 130×
- Lennane v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-12-28· cited 129×
- De Lancie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-07-08· cited 102×
- People v. CalderonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 91×
- People v. WileyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-03-02· cited 89×
- Nunn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-03-19· cited 87×
- In Re Richard S.California Supreme Court· 1991-12-02· cited 74×
- People v. KeliiCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-08-19· cited 68×
- Nickelsberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-08-30· cited 62×
Other cases named People v. Tindall
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.