People v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he inability to recollect the events of the day of the offense due to amnesia does not, by itself, warrant the conclusion that the defendant was unfit.”
• “[T]he inability to recollect the events of the day of the offense due to amnesia does not, by itself, warrant the conclusion that the defendant was unfit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Sandham
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-11-07· cited 20×
• People v. Gray
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2025-03-14· cited 20×
• People v. Allen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-08-11· cited 15×
• People v. Stahl
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2014-06-27· cited 13×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-09· cited 10×
• People v. Hirsch
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-03-08· cited 10×
• York v. Shulsen
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-05-26· cited 8×
• People v. Torres
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-11-19· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Brochu
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-02-22· cited 325×
• People v. Cohn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-22· cited 19×
• People v. Schwartz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-08-12· cited 17×
• People v. Boyd
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-11-09· cited 13×
• People v. Long
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-07-30· cited 11×
• People v. Burgess
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-12-23· cited 8×
• People v. Leiker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-06-08· cited 8×
• People v. Brown
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-03-26· cited 7×
• People v. Reher
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-11· cited 5×
• People v. Smeathers
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-02-14· cited 2×