People v. Reher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that whether the defendant should have known that the protected party would be present is relevant to the determination of whether the defendant intentionally violated the stay-away order by being present at the same time as the protected party in a public place
• reversal of conviction warranted where evidence failed to demonstrate the defendant’s brief encounter with a protected party at a retail store located near the protected party’s home was intentional
• conviction of violating order of protection requires proof of criminal intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).