People v. Tennant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discounting defendant’s argument that “the differences between the purposes of a preliminary hearing and those of a trial *** preclude admitting testimony given at a preliminary hearing” and affirming admission of preliminary hearing testimony
• “ ‘The main and essential purpose of confrontation is to secure for the opponent the opportunity of cross-examination.’ ” (emphasis in original
• the witness at the preliminary hearing “had been cross-examined by counsel for defendant without limitation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named People v. Tennant

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• People v. Tennant
  California Court of Appeal· 1939-03-29· cited 14×
• People v. Tennant
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-10-06· cited 10×
• People v. Tennant
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-07-19· cited 7×
• People v. Tennant
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2023-06-30· cited 6×
• People v. Tennant
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-07-21· cited 3×
• People v. Tennant
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2021-02-17· cited 2×