Illinois Supreme Court· 4/15/2010

People v. Taylor

Citations

927 N.E.2d 1172
237 Ill. 2d 68
340 Ill. Dec. 161
2010 Ill. LEXIS 656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding a rambling statement did not require inquiry where the statement was “amenable to more than one interpretation”
explaining that claims can be “unconventional,” as long defendants “expressly complained about counsel’s performance”
finding a defendant’s statement, which could be subject to multiple interpretations, including regret over a rejected plea deal, was not sufficient to trigger a Krankel inquiry
finding a defendant's statement, which could be subject to multiple interpretations, including regret over a rejected plea deal, was not sufficient to trigger a Krankel inquiry
vague statements are not a clear claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman, Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.