People v. Sweeney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Schmerber on basis that New York law, unlike California law, permits right not to consent to test; defendant arrested and received Miranda warnings
• distinguishing Schmerber on basis that New York law, unlike California law, permits right not to consent to test; defendant arrested and received Miranda warnings
• distinguishing Schmerber on basis that New York law, unlike California law, permits right not to consent to test; defendant arrested and received Miranda warnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• American Fork City v. Crosgrove
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-06-04· cited 46×
• Forte v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-21· cited 46×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-03-17· cited 34×
• State v. Bristor
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1984-05-03· cited 10×
• People v. Gielarowski
  Nassau County District Court· 1968-11-13· cited 4×
• People v. Iannopollo
  New York County Courts· 1983-07-29· cited 4×
• People v. Wassen
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 1991-03-21· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×