Skip to main content

People v. Sutton

Citations

  • 874 N.E.2d 212
  • 375 Ill. App. 3d 889
  • 314 Ill. Dec. 302
  • 2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing court may reverse its prior ruling in the same litigation if it is “palpably erroneous”
  • reviewing court may depart from decision made in prior appeal if “palpably erroneous”
  • reviewing court may depart from decision made in prior appeal if \palpably erroneous\
  • reviewing court may depart from decision made in prior appeal if \palpably erroneous\
  • Crawford constitutional error is reviewed under de nova standard
  • Crawford constitutional error is reviewed under de novo standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.