Skip to main content

People v. Sullivan

Citations

  • 68 N.Y.2d 495
  • 510 N.Y.S.2d 518
  • 503 N.E.2d 74
  • 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the grand jury’s “power to extend lenity” includes “the extreme choices of complete absolution or indictment on the top count supported by legally sufficient evidence” as well as “returning a true bill for only a lesser offense”
  • explaining that the grand jury's \power to extend lenity\ includes \the extreme choices of complete absolution or indictment on the top count supported by legally sufficient evidence\ as well as \returning a true bill for only a lesser offense\
  • providing that “[c]onsistent with centuries of history,” a New York grand jury may “decide that an excessively technical application of the law upon a particular defendant would work an unfairness that would be contrary to the conscience of the community”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wachtler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.