New York Court of Appeals· 2/12/1980
People v. Scarborough
Citations
- 49 N.Y.2d 364
- 402 N.E.2d 1127
- 426 N.Y.S.2d 224
- 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2085
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a court should not engage in the “selective dissection of the integrated testimony of a single witness as to whom credibility, or incredibility, could only be a constant factor”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named People v. Scarborough
8 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- People v. ScarboroughCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-06-08· cited 12×
- People v. ScarboroughMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-05-20· cited 12×
- People v. ScarboroughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-10-25· cited 6×
- People v. ScarboroughCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1942-05-22· cited 5×
- People v. ScarboroughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2022-05-19· cited 2×
- People v. ScarboroughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-07-20· cited 1×
- People v. ScarboroughMichigan Supreme Court· 2010-06-28
- People v. ScarboroughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-11-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.