Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/23/2006

People v. Starks

Citations

850 N.E.2d 206
365 Ill. App. 3d 592
302 Ill. Dec. 769
2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

construing the defendant’s untimely “motion for a new trial” as a motion for post-conviction relief under 725 ILCS 5/122— 1(d)
applying an abuse-of-discretion standard to a review of the trial court's implied construction of defendant's \motion for a new trial\ as a petition under the Act
applying an abuse-of-discretion standard to a review of the trial court’s implied construction of defendant’s “motion for a new trial” as a petition under the Act
applying an abuse-of-discretion standard to a review of the trial court's implied construction of the defendant's \motion for a new trial\ as a petition under the Act
applying an abuse-of-discretion standard to a review of the trial court’s implied construction of the defendant’s “ ‘motion for a new trial’ ” asa petition under the Act
\[T]he trial court did not abuse its discretion in impliedly construing defendant's `motion for a new trial' as a petition under the Act\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAREN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.