Appellate Court of Illinois· 11/18/2003

People v. Dodds

Citations

801 N.E.2d 63
344 Ill. App. 3d 513
279 Ill. Dec. 771
2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 1362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “[negative or non-match results” do not necessarily “exclude the defendant as the perpetrator,” but “the results were favorable, at least in part,” to the defendant
“the non-match for DNA evidence of the bloodstains on defendant’s clothing could have supplied a favorable inference of defendant’s innocence”
circuit court improperly failed to give evidentiary hearing on postconviction petition alleging new DNA evidence which demonstrated defendant was not physically connected to the crime, contrary to the testimony provided by State’s expert trial witness, serologist Pamela Fish
circuit court improperly failed to give evidentiary hearing on post-conviction petition alleging new DNA evidence which demonstrated defendant was not physically connected to the crime, contrary to the testimony provided by State’s expert trial witness, serologist Pamela Fish

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.