People v. Sprouse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Evidence is sufficient where it “support[s] a finding of the accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
• “[T]he trial court may not serve as a thirteenth juror and determine what specific weight should be accorded to various pieces of evidence or by resolving conflicts in the evidence.”
• “[T]he determination of the credibility of witnesses is solely within the province of the jury.”
• “[V]erdicts in criminal cases may not be based on guessing, speculation, or conjecture.”
• “ [T] he trial court may not serve as a thirteenth juror and determine what specific weight should be accorded to various pieces of evidence or by resolving conflicts in the evidence.”
• stating general test for sufficiency of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).