Skip to main content

People v. Ferguson

Citations

  • 43 P.3d 705
  • 2001 Colo. App. LEXIS 1824
  • 2001 WL 1381209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court’s instructional error wasn’t harmless because the erroneous instruction permitted the ju ry “to hold [t he] defendant to a higher standard in establishing self-defense than is required by law”
  • “If the force used by the defendant does not cause death, by definition it cannot be deadly physical force.”
  • prejudicial error to allow jury to consider deadly physical force self-defense principles when, because the victim did not die, “deadly physical force” had not been used
  • An error in the self-defense instruction is not harmless where “we simply cannot determine the manner in which the jury applied the self-defense instruction, if at all.”
  • discussing admissibility of victim’s specific acts of violence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Ruland, Vogt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.