People v. Spears

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• while it may have been preferable for the State to have pushed the lab to complete testing more quickly, in light of the State’s promptness and lack of unreasonable delay (unlike Battles, where there was no evidence of expedience and the delay was calculated to evade the speedy-trial limit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2023-12-19· cited 15×
• People v. Curry
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-09-10· cited 9×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Staten
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1994-07-28· cited 125×
• People v. Battles
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-02-01· cited 38×
• People v. King
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-07-14· cited 27×
• People v. Garcia-Cordova
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-26· cited 19×
• People v. Buford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-06-18· cited 17×
• People v. Hughes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-06-30· cited 16×
• People v. Colson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-17· cited 16×
• People v. Swanson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-06-01· cited 10×