Skip to main content

People v. King

Citations

  • 852 N.E.2d 559
  • 366 Ill. App. 3d 552
  • 304 Ill. Dec. 309
  • 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because DOC essentially had authority over defendant, thé county jail was the equivalent of a DOC institution; therefore, the intrastate-detainer statute was the applicable speedy-trial provision
  • because DOC essentially had authority over defendant, the county jail was the equivalent of a DOC institution; therefore, the intrastate- detainer statute was the applicable speedy-trial provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Turner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.