Skip to main content

People v. Solloway

Citations

  • 316 Mich. App. 174
  • 891 N.W.2d 255
  • 2016 Mich. App. LEXIS 1291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit where the defendant does not provide factual support for his claim
  • holding that in criminal sexual conduct cases, a victim’s testimony may be sufficient to support a defendant’s conviction and need not be corroborated
  • concluding that opposition to the prosecution’s objection on one ground does not preserve challenges to the trial court’s ruling on other grounds
  • concluding that a lapse of 12 years between other acts and charged conduct did not preclude admission of evidence
  • holding that there was a need for the other-acts evidence beyond the victim’s and the defendant’s testimony because there were no eyewitnesses to corroborate the victim’s testimony
  • holding that there was a need for the other-acts evidence beyond the victim’s and the defendant’s testimony because there were no eyewitnesses to corroborate the victim’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Servitto, Gadola, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Solloway

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.