Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 8/4/1995

People v. Sneed

Citations

  • 653 N.E.2d 1349
  • 210 Ill. Dec. 887
  • 274 Ill. App. 3d 287
  • 1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the court has no discretion to admit a juvenile adjudication against a testifying defendant, citing proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 609(d), as adopted in Montgomery, and Kerns
  • stating that the court has no discretion to admit a juvenile adjudication against a testifying defendant, citing proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 609(d), as adopted in Montgomery, and Kerns
  • appellate court considered fact that defendant was asked, and agreed to go to station, with grandmother present as evidence that the defendant voluntarily accompanied the police

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNULTY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.