People v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the event statutes conflict, effect shall be given to both, if possible. If not, the more specific provision shall prevail as an exception to the general rule, absent a clear legislative intent to revoke the prior specific provision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• v. Hamm
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-06-20· cited 525×
• People v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1999-01-11· cited 29×
• People v. Shipley
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2001-05-14· cited 4×
• People v. Smith
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1997-04-03· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fuhrer v. Department of Motor Vehicles
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1979-03-26· cited 31×
• People v. Delgado
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1991-11-07· cited 13×
• People v. Munoz
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1993-05-27· cited 10×