California Court of Appeal· 8/18/2006
People v. Smith
Citations
- 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 378
- 142 Cal. App. 4th 923
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 12105
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8465
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the difference between possessory right under the burglary statute and family law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollenhorst, McKinster, Richli
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. UlloaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-12-21· cited 19×
- People v. GillCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-01-22· cited 15×
- State v. SingleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-04-04· cited 10×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-08-22· cited 10×
- State v. WhiteNevada Supreme Court· 2014-07-10
- People v. BuycksCalifornia Supreme Court· 2018-07-30
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 319×
- People v. GauzeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-12-12· cited 188×
- People v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-05-21· cited 135×
- People v. PendletonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-09-14· cited 102×
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 98×
- People v. SalemmeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-01-13· cited 50×
- MacHado v. MacHadoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-10-04· cited 46×
- People v. DavenportCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-04-18· cited 19×
- Fortes v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-12-19· cited 10×
- People v. ClaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-07-02· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.