Skip to main content

People v. Smith

Citations

  • 596 N.E.2d 789
  • 232 Ill. App. 3d 121
  • 173 Ill. Dec. 165
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 1097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a trial court may sua sponte reconsider a prior final appealable order within 30 days of its entry because that is the period for which it retains jurisdiction
  • rejecting McDermott’s testimony and finding that the arrestee was detained on pretext
  • same, relying on People v. Williams, 138 Ill.2d 377, 150 Ill.Dec. 498, 563 N.E.2d 385 (1990)
  • same, relying on People v. Williams, 138 Ill.2d 377, 150 Ill.Dec. 498, 563 N.E.2d 385 (1990)
  • suppression order not appealable under Rule 604(a)(1) until the trial court completed rulings on all of the relief requested by the defendant in its motion to quash and suppress
  • judge’s finding that the defendant was arrested solely as a pretext for obtaining an identification in a lineup and that the officers’ conduct, including McDermott’s, was flagrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lorenz, Murray, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.