California Court of Appeal· 11/2/1970
People v. Smith
Citations
- 12 Cal. App. 3d 621
- 90 Cal. Rptr. 811
- 1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 1653
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is equally clear that probation was revoked ... and a bench warrant was issued so that judgment and sentence could be imposed, imposition thereof having been suspended approximately three years earlier.... ”
- “It is also settled that an order revoking probation, to be valid, must be made within the period fixed in the order of probation. If not revoked within that period, the probation terminates automatically on the last day.”
- “It is equally clear that probation was revoked and a bench warrant was issued so that judgment and- sentence could be im~' posed, imposition thereof having been suspended approximately three years earlier....”
- “It is equally clear that probation was revoked and a bench warrant was issued so that judgment and sentence could be im- posed, imposition thereof ' having be'en suspended approximately three years earlier....”
- “_It is also settled that an order revoking probation to_be_valid,_mu_st be made within the period fixed m the order of probation, If not revoked within that >period,_ the pro mbation terminates automaticallyo on tli_te__Last_cla
- “It is also settled that an order revoking probation, to be valid, must be made within the period fixed in the order of probation. If not revoked within that period, the probation terminates automatically on the last day.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coakley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2018-04-26· cited 98×
- United States v. Pablo StallingsEighth Circuit· 2002-08-23· cited 39×
- People v. AngusCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-12-30· cited 39×
- People v. Ronnie P.California Court of Appeal· 1992-10-30· cited 38×
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-09-19· cited 35×
- In Re DaoudCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-05-10· cited 23×
- People v. RusterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-07-22· cited 22×
- In Re MehdizadehCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-02-27· cited 20×
- Beckley v. Denise C.California Court of Appeal· 1975-03-06· cited 15×
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-07-08· cited 15×
- In Re ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-08-03· cited 15×
- People v. AveryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-04-18· cited 12×
- People v. BroadwayAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1981-07-28· cited 3×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-06· cited 1×
- Williams, Milton VeranCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-03-13
- Williams, Milton VeranCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-07-13
- People v. ArreguinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-06-14
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re LeviCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-05-19· cited 106×
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-06-25· cited 93×
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-08-31· cited 77×
- In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-10-26· cited 63×
- In Re PerezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-09-21· cited 61×
- In Re BineCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-02-01· cited 59×
- In Re DearoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-02-17· cited 33×
- People v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1966-10-19· cited 30×
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-05-01· cited 12×
- People v. De WaeleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-02-06· cited 9×
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-03-25· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.