People v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecution was timely based on double extension of statute of limitations where each extension was effective before then-applicable limitations period had run

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Mendez
  California Supreme Court· 1999-01-14· cited 317×
• People v. Voit
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-11-18· cited 122×
• Commonwealth v. Bargeron
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-06-14· cited 59×
• People v. Young
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-03-07· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Rocheleau
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-02-13· cited 21×
• People v. Bunn
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-02-28· cited 11×
• State v. Creekpaum
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-02-13· cited 10×
• Lynch v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-03-13· cited 8×
• People v. Lozano
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-04-10

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Estrada
  California Supreme Court· 1965-12-23· cited 2,432×
• Estate of McDill
  California Supreme Court· 1975-07-24· cited 309×
• People v. Chadd
  California Supreme Court· 1981-01-19· cited 214×
• People v. Padfield
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-09-30· cited 57×
• People v. Jerome
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-10-16· cited 44×
• People v. Swinney
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-03-21· cited 34×
• Sobiek v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-11-21· cited 21×
• People v. Sample
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-11-20· cited 20×
• In Re Davis
  California Court of Appeal· 1936-04-04· cited 17×
• People v. Nevarez
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-03-31· cited 5×