People v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that vacation home is “dwelling” under residential burglary statute; key inquiry in defining “dwelling” is “the intent of the owner to reside in the building within a reasonable period of time after his absence”
• finding that vacation home is “dwelling” under residential burglary statute; key inquiry in defining “dwelling” is “the intent of the owner to reside in the building within a reasonable period of time after his absence”
• stating in dicta that an attached garage used for storage is not a dwelling
• vacation home considered a dwelling, key inquiry was intent of owner to reside in building within reasonable period of time after absence
• a home used for only part of the year was a dwelling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Cunningham
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-07-22· cited 17×
• People v. Borgen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-07-09· cited 16×
• Herrick v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-09-04· cited 10×
• State v. Scott
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-07-24· cited 5×
• Grady v. Sikorski
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-06-18· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Thomas
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 175×
• People v. Bales
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-09-20· cited 137×
• People v. Dawson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-07-28· cited 21×
• People v. Benge
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-03-28· cited 3×