People v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in 1964, the prior version of the Code was supplanted by section 111-3, which contains no requirement that the commencement of an indictment be in any particular form or contain any particular language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lucas
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-12-11· cited 19×
• People v. Brown
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-05-03· cited 18×
• People v. Allum
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1967-01-04· cited 11×
• People v. Lomax
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1970-06-26· cited 9×
• People v. Ford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-11-12· cited 8×
• People v. Kliner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-02-20· cited 3×
• People v. Bell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-05-23· cited 3×
• People v. Cookson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-08-26· cited 3×
• People v. Hall
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1971-11-11· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Escobedo v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
• The People v. Blanchett
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1965-11-19· cited 110×
• The People v. Flaherty
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1947-01-22· cited 55×
• The People v. Weaver
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1959-11-18· cited 36×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1965-11-05· cited 35×
• People v. Shaw
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1921-12-22· cited 26×
• The People v. Sellers
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1964-01-22· cited 19×
• The People v. Lewis
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1965-03-18· cited 15×