People v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] per se disqualification is based on the invalid presumption that public defenders are unable to subordinate office allegiances to the foremost obligation owed to their clients.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Pinkonsly
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2003-11-20· cited 227×
• In re Tamera W.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-03-29· cited 28×
• People v. Pinkonsly
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-06-20· cited 7×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-09-12· cited 6×
• People v. Lawton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-12-02· cited 5×
• People v. Parham
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-01-30

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Washington
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-01-20· cited 126×
• The PEOPLE v. Smith
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-09-29· cited 81×
• People v. Banks
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-11-23· cited 68×
• The PEOPLE v. Brown
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-03-28· cited 53×
• The People v. Anderson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1964-09-29· cited 35×
• The PEOPLE v. Terry
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1970-09-22· cited 32×
• People v. Aliwoli
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1975-05-19· cited 24×
• People v. Charles S.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-04-17· cited 15×
• People v. Bach
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-07-16· cited 14×
• Putnam v. People
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1951-03-22· cited 12×
• People v. Jacobs
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1975-11-17· cited 11×
• People v. Savage
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-11-09· cited 8×
• People v. Washington
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-12-30· cited 7×
• People v. McManus
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-12-29· cited 4×