People v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• despite assuming officer's attempted stop of defendant's vehicle was an illegal seizure, evidence of the new crimes of eluding a police officer and criminal mischief was admissible
• “[I]f, following an illegal stop or attempted stop, the detained person's response is itself a new, distinct crime, then the police constitutionally may arrest the person for that crime and the evidentiary fruit of that arrest will not be suppressed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Doke
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2007-11-26· cited 13×
• Strickland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-02-11· cited 10×
• State v. Holt
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-29· cited 7×
• People v. Cappelli
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1996-11-18· cited 6×
• v. Compos
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-12-05· cited 6×
• People v. Martin
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-08-28· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• California v. Hodari D.
  Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
• United States v. Carl Bailey
  Eleventh Circuit· 1983-01-10· cited 208×
• People v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1983-03-28· cited 100×
• United States v. Steven Curtis Waupekenay
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-08-31· cited 57×
• People v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1994-01-24· cited 56×
• State v. Indvik
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-02-20· cited 45×
• State v. Miskimins
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-01-25· cited 40×
• People v. Fox
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-06-05· cited 34×
• People v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1989-12-18· cited 11×