Skip to main content

People v. Singmouangthong

Citations

  • 778 N.E.2d 390
  • 334 Ill. App. 3d 542
  • 268 Ill. Dec. 404
  • 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion because it reasonably concluded that the proposition being illustrated was so simple that no further illustration was necessary
  • noting authority cited by defendant did not expressly pass on the issue of severability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grometer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Singmouangthong

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.