Skip to main content

People v. Scott

Citations

  • 61 Cal. 4th 363
  • 349 P.3d 1028
  • 188 Cal. Rptr. 3d 328
  • 2015 Cal. LEXIS 3903

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • [“the high court has held that ‘the Sixth Amendment’s restriction on judge-found facts’ is ‘inapplicable’ when a trial judge makes factual findings necessary to the imposition of consecutive terms.”].

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kruger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

125 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.