Skip to main content

People v. Armstrong

Citations

  • 243 Cal. Rptr. 3d 105
  • 6 Cal. 5th 735
  • 433 P.3d 987

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The prosecutor herself 26 highlighted the considerations that concerned her most. The trial court took her at 27 her word and evaluated those reasons for their genuineness and neutrality. Once 1 they passed muster, it was not error to omit express consideration of secondary 2 factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corrigan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

109 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.