Illinois Supreme Court· 10/26/2000
People v. Scott
Citations
- 742 N.E.2d 287
- 194 Ill. 2d 268
- 252 Ill. Dec. 37
- 2000 Ill. LEXIS 1693
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that trial court's disposition of the defendant's postconviction petition was immediately appealable even though trial court determined that the defendant should receive a new sentencing hearing
- noting that trial court’s disposition of the defendant’s post-conviction petition was immediately appealable even though trial court determined that the defendant should receive a new sentencing hearing
- noting that trial court's disposition of the defendant's postconviction petition was immediately appealable even though trial court determined that the defendant should receive a new sentencing hearing
- following Joyce and holding that the same rule applied where the court ordered a new sentencing hearing following postconviction proceedings
- regarding claims in postconviction petition, “issues that could have been raised in the earlier proceedings, but were not, will ordinarily be deemed waived”
- the Act establishes an original and independent remedy by a civil proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-09-20· cited 888×
- People v. FikaraAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-12-23· cited 37×
- People v. JeffersonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-11-26· cited 33×
- People v. JarrettAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-03-18· cited 27×
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-05-01· cited 24×
- People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-06-04· cited 21×
- People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court· 2025-04-24· cited 15×
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-30· cited 11×
- People v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-01-24· cited 10×
- People v. MyersAppellate Court of Illinois· 2023-09-12· cited 7×
- People v. BrooksAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-12-26· cited 5×
- People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-04-22· cited 2×
- People v. Fikara Supplemental Opinion on Denial of Rehearing - see end of this opinionAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-10-10
- People v. Jefferson Modified upon Rehearing - replaces opinion filed 10/23/03Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-11-26
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 1,609×
- Skipper v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1986-04-29· cited 1,534×
- People v. BullIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-11-10· cited 417×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 297×
- People v. BarrowIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 241×
- People v. WinsettIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 190×
- People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 180×
- People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-09-23· cited 173×
- People v. TennerIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-02-03· cited 163×
- People v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-04-16· cited 154×
- People v. ThompkinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 146×
- People v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-09-18· cited 139×
- People v. RuizIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-09-25· cited 138×
- People v. EmersonIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-04-03· cited 133×
- People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 129×
- People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 122×
- People v. McNealIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-01-30· cited 113×
- People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-12-31· cited 102×
- People v. CrewsIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-02-11· cited 83×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.