Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/16/2005

People v. Scott

Citations

824 N.E.2d 302
355 Ill. App. 3d 741
291 Ill. Dec. 726
2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 160
2005 WL 418808

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that defense counsel properly stipulated to the nature of the controlled substances as a matter of trial strategy where defendant claimed he never participated in a drug transaction
finding that defense counsel properly stipulated to the nature of the controlled substances as a matter of trial strategy where defendant claimed he never participated in a drug transaction
stating defense counsel's decision not to contest the lab report by calling the chemist did not amount to a confrontation violation because \[d]oing so could have confused the jurors and distracted them from defendant's defense\
in which a different panel from the Third District Appellate Court held that the Phillips II court misinterpreted Campbell
in which a different panel from the Third District Appellate Court held that the Phillips II court misinterpreted Campbell
stipulation as to weight and nature of recovered items was matter of trial strategy because weight and nature were not contested and defendant presented an alibi defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Slater, McDade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.