Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/19/2005

People v. Matthews

Citations

  • 842 N.E.2d 150
  • 362 Ill. App. 3d 953
  • 299 Ill. Dec. 411
  • 2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 1264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that by failing to object to his presentence report, the defendant conceded the accuracy of the report with respect to his prior convictions
  • holding that by failing to object to his presentence report, the defendant conceded the accuracy of the report with respect to his prior convictions
  • holding that the defendant conceded the accuracy of his prior convictions in his PSI report by failing to object to the report
  • holding that by failing to object to his presentence report, the defendant conceded the accuracy of the report with respect to his prior convictions and the appropriateness of his sentencing as a repeat offender
  • “the failure to object [to a PSI] results in a concession of its accuracy and the waiver of the claims of inaccuracy”
  • the defendant’s possession of narcotics was established through the testimony of witnesses, not counsel’s stipulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.