Illinois Supreme Court· 11/22/2000
People v. Schmalz
Citations
- 740 N.E.2d 775
- 194 Ill. 2d 75
- 251 Ill. Dec. 489
- 2000 Ill. LEXIS 1706
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that exclusive possession may be joint
- “The rule that possession must be exclusive does not mean that the possession may not be joint ***.”
- actual possession exists when a person has “immediate and exclusive dominion or control over” a thing
- “if two or more persons share immediate and exclusive control or share the intention and power to exercise control, then each has possession”
- \The rule that possession must be exclusive does not mean that the possession may not be joint ***.\
- \The rule that possession must be exclusive does not mean that the possession may not be joint ***.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. Siguenza-BritoIllinois Supreme Court· 2009-11-19· cited 629×
- People v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-04-19· cited 176×
- People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court· 2023-01-20· cited 120×
- People v. WiseIllinois Supreme Court· 2021-04-15· cited 59×
- People v. NeylonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-01-14· cited 47×
- People v. McLaurinAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-06-14· cited 45×
- People v. PearsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-05-21· cited 38×
- People v. LogginsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2019-08-26· cited 35×
- People v. EghanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-11-13· cited 32×
- People v. BeasleyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-08-22· cited 31×
- People v. BalarkAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-06-19· cited 28×
- People v. TerrellAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-06-22· cited 27×
- People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court· 2020-04-02· cited 23×
- People v. GumilaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-12-06· cited 22×
- People v. CootsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-04-16· cited 21×
- People v. WarrenAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-09-05· cited 19×
- People v. LaraAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-09-29· cited 18×
- People v. DanielsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2025-02-07· cited 17×
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-12-29· cited 16×
- People v. PowellAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-12-30· cited 15×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-02-22· cited 2,507×
- People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-02-19· cited 602×
- People v. FriebergIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-03-12· cited 332×
- The People v. GallowayIllinois Supreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 117×
- The PEOPLE v. EmbryIllinois Supreme Court· 1960-10-31· cited 82×
- The People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court· 1961-11-30· cited 73×
- People v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-03-05· cited 70×
- People v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-08-04· cited 60×
- People v. RayAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-07-20· cited 59×
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-05-19· cited 32×
- People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-04-07· cited 12×
- People v. BrookhouseAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-07-10· cited 2×
- People v. SchmalzAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-09-22· cited 2×
Other cases named People v. Schmalz
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.