Skip to main content

People v. Pearson

Citations

  • 770 N.E.2d 1183
  • 331 Ill. App. 3d 312
  • 264 Ill. Dec. 487
  • 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing one-act, one-crime claim under plain-error doctrine because “defendant’s substantial rights [were] affected”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cahill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.