People v. Schladweiler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that invasion of privacy by physical intrusion requires intrusion into plaintiff’s private physical space
• finding that statements made in police reports and to HOA board members were not publicized for the purpose of a false light claim
• holding defendant’s filing of two police reports and oral statements made to at least two police officers did not constitute publicity for an invasion of privacy claim
• neighbors did not act outrageously by installing surveillance camera, filing police reports, and “waging a campaign in the community against plaintiff’
• intentional infliction of emotional distress reserved for situations beyond all bounds of human decency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).