Skip to main content
· 9/24/1992

Launius v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF CITY OF DES PLAINES

Citations

  • 603 N.E.2d 477
  • 151 Ill. 2d 419
  • 177 Ill. Dec. 407
  • 1992 Ill. LEXIS 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • warning that “it is not the court’s function to resolve factual inconsistencies”
  • resolving factual inconsistencies and determining where the preponderance of the evidence lies are not functions of the reviewing court
  • “It is not *** the court’s duty to weigh the evidence and then determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies.”
  • in determining whether findings are against the manifest weight of the evidence, reviewing court does not weigh the evidence to determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies
  • \It is not * * * the court's duty to weigh the evidence and then determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies.\
  • in determining whether findings are against the manifest weight of the evidence, reviewing court does not weigh the evidence to determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas J. Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.