· 9/24/1992
Launius v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF CITY OF DES PLAINES
Citations
- 603 N.E.2d 477
- 151 Ill. 2d 419
- 177 Ill. Dec. 407
- 1992 Ill. LEXIS 126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- warning that “it is not the court’s function to resolve factual inconsistencies”
- resolving factual inconsistencies and determining where the preponderance of the evidence lies are not functions of the reviewing court
- “It is not *** the court’s duty to weigh the evidence and then determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies.”
- in determining whether findings are against the manifest weight of the evidence, reviewing court does not weigh the evidence to determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies
- \It is not * * * the court's duty to weigh the evidence and then determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies.\
- in determining whether findings are against the manifest weight of the evidence, reviewing court does not weigh the evidence to determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas J. Moran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.