Appellate Court of Illinois· 7/3/1985
People v. Saunders
Citations
- 482 N.E.2d 85
- 135 Ill. App. 3d 594
- 90 Ill. Dec. 378
- 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 2293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding notice of assignment where defense counsel mentioned trial judge by name while asking court to confirm schedule for arraignment
- finding notice of assignment where defense counsel mentioned trial judge by name while asking court to confirm schedule for arraignment
- finding notice of assignment where defense counsel mentioned trial judge by name while -9- No. 1-14-0598 asking court to confirm schedule for arraignment
- the purpose of Rule 402(f), which is to encourage negotiation, “would not be served” by excluding statements “made after and pursuant to the agreement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hopf
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lundquist v. NickelsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-25· cited 49×
- Rockford Township Highway Department v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-03-30· cited 42×
- American Pharmaseal v. TEC SYSTEMSAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-10-30· cited 31×
- People v. EubanksIllinois Supreme Court· 2021-11-18· cited 28×
- People v. BrajckiAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-11-20· cited 27×
- Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-30· cited 26×
- People v. SaundersAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-05-05· cited 25×
- State v. HansonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-06-16· cited 23×
- People v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-08-18· cited 13×
- Williams v. ArnN.D. Ohio· 1986-06-13· cited 11×
- People v. MaltimoreAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-12-29· cited 11×
- People v. Perez-GonzalezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-07-30· cited 8×
- People v. SiemsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-06-09· cited 7×
- State v. PittCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-02-01· cited 6×
- People v. TateAppellate Court of Illinois· 2018-02-02· cited 5×
- People v. NavarroliAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-07-21· cited 4×
- People v. EubanksAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-07-14· cited 1×
- People v. EubanksAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-12-30· cited 1×
- People v. CoxAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-02-21· cited 1×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- People v. La PointeIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-01-29· cited 680×
- United States v. Robert H. Davis, United States of America v. George D. GelestinoD.C. Circuit· 1980-03-07· cited 208×
- People v. BarnardIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-19· cited 152×
- People v. FriedmanIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-03-28· cited 148×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Raymond Scotland and St. Clair Springette. Appeal of St. Clair SpringetteThird Circuit· 1980-02-06· cited 102×
- United States v. Ermil GrantEighth Circuit· 1980-04-29· cited 79×
- People Ex Rel. Kunce v. HoganIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-06-01· cited 75×
- People v. StarksIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-05-31· cited 51×
- People v. HillIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-02-22· cited 48×
- The PEOPLE v. WhitfieldIllinois Supreme Court· 1968-06-21· cited 43×
- People v. SchlemmAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-03-20· cited 41×
- People v. WinstonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-05-18· cited 36×
- People v. NoeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-07-30· cited 25×
- People v. VictoryAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-03-27· cited 19×
- Domagalski v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-06-17· cited 17×
- People v. McNealAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-12-29· cited 15×
- People v. WeeksAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-03-29· cited 13×
- People v. BoytAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-10-15· cited 13×
- People v. FergusonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-11-12· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.