Skip to main content

Citations

  • 282 A.D.2d 102
  • 726 N.Y.S.2d 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a violation of N.Y. Penal Law § 220.39(1
  • holding that a violation of N.Y. Penal Law § 220.39(1) may be proven by circumstantial evidence, and that “[w]here the proof offered is circumstantial, there is no basis in policy, logic or law for limiting that proof to any particular genre of evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedman, Rosenberger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.