People v. Guidice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[a] defendant’s statement is considered direct evidence if it constitutes ‘a relevant admission of guilt’ ”; no circumstantial evidence charge necessary based on defendant’s statements relevant to his guilt
• no circumstantial evidence charge necessary based on defendant’s statements relevant to his guilt; “[a] defendant’s statement is considered direct evidence if it constitutes ‘a relevant admission of guilt’ ”
• “Lack of medical treatment is but a factor to consider ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).