California Court of Appeal· 3/24/2005
People v. Saffold
Citations
- 26 Cal. Rptr. 3d 190
- 127 Cal. App. 4th 979
- 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2550
- 2005 Daily Journal DAR 3473
- 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- proof of service “is not a testimonial statement within the holding of Crawford”
- affidavits used to establish chain of custody for documents not testimonial
- proof of service of domestic relations restraining order not testimonial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilbert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado· 2021-02-01· cited 321×
- State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 70×
- People v. TaultonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-05-31· cited 54×
- State v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-03-25· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. ShangkuanMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-02-28· cited 18×
- Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-05-17· cited 11×
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Michael GARCIASupreme Court of Colorado· 2021-02-01· cited 2×
- Quartrez Logan, s/k/a Quartrez Rashad Logan v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2020-07-21
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Leavitt v. AraveNinth Circuit· 2004-09-07· cited 182×
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-07-18· cited 112×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-08-31· cited 71×
- San Diego County Department of Social Services v. ForsytheCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-06-10· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.