Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/2/2001

People v. Rush

Citations

745 N.E.2d 157
319 Ill. App. 3d 34
253 Ill. Dec. 383
2001 Ill. App. LEXIS 179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

a traffic stop for crossing the lane divider is invalid “only if the officer knows additional facts that make it reasonably apparent that the crossing is legal” (emphasis in original)
open can of beer in vehicle was factor to consider in determining probable cause to arrest for DUI
“the law does not permit a driver to cross the center line merely because he is being closely followed”
a traffic stop for crossing the lane divider is invalid \only if the officer knows additional facts that make it reasonably apparent that the crossing is legal\ (emphasis in original)
defendant crossed the center line twice and the fog line once
in light of. statute requiring that vehicles be driven upon the right half of the roadway, “a driver’s single, momentary crossing of the center line, without more, is a sufficient basis for a stop” (citing 625 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/11— 701(a))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rapp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.