Skip to main content

People v. Rush

Citations

  • 928 N.E.2d 157
  • 401 Ill. App. 3d 1
  • 340 Ill. Dec. 438
  • 2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “an officer’s testimony that he acted upon information received, or words to that effect, should be sufficient”
  • error is harmless if there is no reasonable possibility that, absent the error, the verdict would have been different
  • a statement is admissible if offered for the limited purpose of explaining why the police acted as they did
  • failure to provide a limiting instruction to the jury to explain the limited purpose for the admission of evidence related to the investigative steps taken by police waived by the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.