Skip to main content
· 7/28/2005

People v. RUILOBA

Citations

  • 31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 838
  • 131 Cal. App. 4th 674
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6705
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 9155
  • 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if a pretext call is not explicit, if a reasonable trier of fact could conclude that defendant and victim were discussing a sexual relationship between themselves during victim’s minority, this would corroborate the victim’s allegations under section 803(g)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.