Appellate Court of Illinois· 8/13/2008

People v. Rose

Citations

894 N.E.2d 156
384 Ill. App. 3d 937
323 Ill. Dec. 597
2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to extend the exclusionary rule to bar unlawfully obtained evidence for substantive purposes at sentencing
the exclusionary rule does not apply to sentencing, where evidentiary standards are less rigid
the exclusionary rule does not apply to sentencing, where evidentiary standards are less rigid
“[A] finding of not guilty is not a conclusive finding that the defendant did not commit the crime, but rather means that the State was unable to offer proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he did.”
evidentiary standards at sentencing are less rigid than those imposed at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.