Skip to main content

People v. Rivera

Citations

  • 879 N.E.2d 876
  • 227 Ill. 2d 1
  • 316 Ill. Dec. 488
  • 2007 Ill. LEXIS 1705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that defendant Rivera was not arguing that the juror in question “was subject to excusal for cause”
  • error amenable to harmless error review where it was “possible to qualitatively assess for harm”
  • determination of whether the improper denial of defendant's peremptory challenge and violation of Apprendi were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt premised on analysis of whether the defendant's guilt was overwhelming
  • determination of whether the improper denial of defendant’s peremptory challenge and violation of Apprendi were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt premised on analysis of whether the defendant’s guilt was overwhelming
  • errors are amenable to harmless error review when it is “possible to qualitatively assess for harm”
  • determination of whether the improper denial of defendant’s peremptory challenge and violation of Apprendi were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt premised on analysis of whether the defendant’s guilt was overwhelming

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karmeier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.