People v. Restifo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a county's failure to update a computer database was negligent and therefore \not enough by itself to require\ exclusion
• holding that the exclusionary rule applies only where it \result[s] in appreciable deterrence\ (alteration in original
• stating error was not systemic when witnesses testified that they could remember \no similar [error] ever happening on their watch\
• noting “[t]he fact that a Fourth Amendment violation occurred . . . does not necessarily mean that the exclusionary rule applies”
• “The extent to which the exclusionary rule is justified by these deterrence principles varies with the culpability of the law enforcement conduct”
• exclusionary rule inapplicable to police mistakes leading to unlawful search not the result of systemic error or reckless disregard of constitutional requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).