People v. Randall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] defendant may introduce evidence of his or her good character or personality through ‘general reputation’ evidence but not expert personal opinion testimony.”
• “[A] defendant may introduce evidence of his or her good character or personality through ‘general reputation’ evidence but not expert personal opinion testimony.”
• “[A] defendant may introduce evidence of his or her good character or personality through ‘general reputation’ evidence but not expert personal opinion testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• People v. Garner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2016-11-30· cited 6×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,420×
• JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,335×
• People v. Steidl
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-09-18· cited 137×
• People v. Orange
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2001-04-19· cited 112×
• People v. Blackwell
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-04-18· cited 81×
• People v. Hudson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2001-03-02· cited 77×
• People v. Owen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-10-20· cited 64×
• People v. Simpkins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-08-06· cited 62×
• People v. Beard
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-03-16· cited 34×
• People v. Bradley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-11-18· cited 17×
• In Re BJ
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-09-07· cited 17×