Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/9/2003

People v. Ramos

Citations

791 N.E.2d 592
339 Ill. App. 3d 891
274 Ill. Dec. 500
2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 718

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding forfeiture of part of ineffectiveness claim for failure to raise it below
“Dixon would apply to this case only if we were to reverse the charge of aggravated battery with a firearm”
“we believe that Dixon must be narrowly construed as not sanctioning the *** review of unappealed and unsentenced convictions when the greater offense has not been reversed and vacated”
court would not address ineffectiveness argument that the defendant, represented by new posttrial counsel, did not include in his posttrial motions
\Dixon would apply to this case only if we were to reverse the charge of aggravated battery with a firearm\
“we believe that Dixon must be narrowly construed as not sanctioning the *** review of unappealed and unsentenced convictions when the greater offense has not been reversed and vacated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAREN, O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.