Appellate Court of Illinois· 9/25/1991

People v. Abdullah

Citations

581 N.E.2d 67
220 Ill. App. 3d 687
163 Ill. Dec. 116
1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 1639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the “condition of the vehicle is one of the most significant factors which courts consider in determining whether or not the defendant had knowledge of the vehicle’s theft.”
steering column damaged and broken key lodged in ignition that did not start the van
a reviewing court has neither the duty nor the privilege to substitute its judgment for the trier of fact
element of knowledge can be properly inferred from the condition of the vehicle, including peeled steering column
“A reviewing court has neither the duty nor the privilege to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact.”
a reviewing court has neither the duty nor the privilege to substitute its judgment for the trier of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greiman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.