People v. Ramos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We agree with the State that a verbatim reading of the entire contents of the order of protection is not necessary in order to put the defendant on notice of what conduct is prohibited.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Jamesson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-04-23· cited 40×
• People v. Winningham
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-05· cited 23×
• People v. Arndt
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-08-18· cited 23×
• People v. Vasquez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-06-04· cited 21×
• People v. Hinton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-22· cited 19×
• People v. Brzowski
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-06-18· cited 13×
• People v. Hill
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-05-02· cited 4×
• People v. Brown
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-12-18· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Collins
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-02-22· cited 2,507×
• People v. Hickman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1994-11-23· cited 200×
• People v. Rothermel
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-01-21· cited 33×
• People v. Daniels
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-07-27· cited 32×
• People v. Johnson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-12-03· cited 30×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-09-11· cited 17×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-07· cited 17×
• The PEOPLE v. Bueno
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1966-11-14· cited 15×